.svg)
How does biochar sequester carbon in soil?
The carbon removal process starts with photosynthesis—plants pull CO₂ from the atmosphere and turn it into leaves, stems, and roots. After harvest or collection, this plant material becomes feedstock for pyrolysis facilities, where it's heated to temperatures between 400°C and 700°C in sealed chambers with very little oxygen. This breaks down the plant's structure while leaving behind a carbon-rich solid with lots of tiny pores and channels.
What makes biochar different from regular plant material is its chemical stability. During pyrolysis, carbon atoms rearrange into tightly connected ring structures that resist breaking down. When you add this biochar to soil, the microbes that would normally decompose organic matter find it much harder to break apart these stable carbon forms, so the carbon stays locked away instead of returning to the atmosphere as CO₂.
Pyrolysis chemistry
Pyrolysis is a heating process that happens without oxygen, which keeps the biomass from simply catching fire. As temperatures climb, water evaporates first, then the main plant components—hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin—start breaking down. The process creates three products: biochar (the solid), syngas (a mix of hydrogen and carbon monoxide), and bio-oil (a liquid).
The key to carbon storage lies in the biochar's makeup. High-temperature pyrolysis produces biochar with a low ratio of hydrogen to carbon, which signals a higher proportion of those stable ring structures. These condensed carbon frameworks resist oxidation and microbial breakdown—exactly what you want for long-term storage.
Stabilization mechanisms
Once biochar enters the soil, several things work together to keep the carbon in place. The physical structure of biochar—full of pores and channels—allows it to get tucked inside soil clumps, protecting it from microbes. The chemical resistance from those ring structures formed during pyrolysis makes the material naturally hard to decompose.
Biochar also bonds with soil minerals and organic compounds, creating complexes that further lock down the carbon. While a small fraction of biochar will slowly oxidize over time, most of it can persist for centuries. Field studies and radiocarbon dating of ancient char deposits—like the Terra Preta soils of the Amazon—show that biochar can remain stable for thousands of years.
Biochar production pathways and feedstocks
Biochar can be made from almost any plant material, but the choice of feedstock significantly affects the quality and carbon content of the final product.
Agricultural residues
Crop leftovers represent one of the most abundant feedstock sources because they're already generated as by-products of farming. Rice husks, corn stalks, wheat straw, and sugarcane waste are common materials that would otherwise decompose in fields or get burned—both of which release carbon back into the air.
- Rice husks
- Corn stover and cobs
- Wheat straw
- Sugarcane bagasse
- Nut shells (coconut, walnut)
The carbon content varies depending on the crop type. Woody residues like nut shells tend to produce higher-quality biochar compared to materials like straw, though both can deliver meaningful carbon removal when processed correctly.
Forestry by-products
Wood-based feedstocks—including sawdust, mill leftovers, logging debris, and bark—typically yield biochar with higher carbon content and lower ash compared to agricultural residues. The catch is that forestry feedstocks need to come from sustainable sources: residues from existing timber operations work well, but cutting down trees solely for biochar production could trigger emissions that cancel out the climate benefit.
Purpose-grown biomass
Fast-growing crops like miscanthus, switchgrass, and short-rotation trees can provide consistent feedstock for biochar facilities. The crops are often grown on marginal lands unsuitable for food production. However, purpose-grown biomass raises questions about land use and water consumption—concerns that become especially important if energy crops displace food production or natural ecosystems.
Durability and scientific validation of storage
The climate value of biochar hinges on permanence—how long the carbon actually stays locked away.
Radiocarbon dating evidence
Perhaps the strongest proof of biochar's permanence comes from carbon-14 dating of ancient charcoal deposits. The Terra Preta soils of the Amazon basin, created by indigenous peoples hundreds to thousands of years ago, still contain substantial amounts of char today. This char has persisted through centuries of tropical heat, rain, and farming—conditions that would have decomposed normal plant material within years.
Similar evidence appears in archaeological sites worldwide, where charcoal fragments from ancient fires remain identifiable millennia later.
Field trial results
Modern field trials track biochar stability across different soil types and climates. Studies measuring biochar carbon over 5-10 year periods consistently show high retention rates, with less than 1% breaking down each year. The stability varies with feedstock and pyrolysis temperature—higher-temperature biochar (above 500°C) from wood shows greater resistance to decomposition than lower-temperature biochar from grasses.
Biochar and carbon sequestration benefits beyond CO₂
Beyond carbon storage, biochar can deliver additional benefits that enhance project value, though results vary depending on biochar properties and soil conditions.
Soil fertility gains
Biochar's porous structure and charged surface can improve how well soil holds onto nutrients by increasing cation exchange capacity—essentially creating more spots where nutrients can attach instead of washing away. This effect is particularly strong in acidic, weathered soils where nutrient leaching is a major problem. Biochar can also buffer soil pH, gradually raising acidity toward neutral levels.
Biochar isn't a fertilizer replacement—it doesn't supply significant nutrients itself. Instead, it acts as a retention mechanism, reducing losses and improving the efficiency of applied fertilizers.
Water retention and drought resilience
The pore structure of biochar can increase how much water soil can hold, particularly in sandy or degraded soils with low organic matter. By creating additional pore space, biochar helps soils capture and retain rainfall, potentially reducing irrigation needs. In regions facing water scarcity, this benefit can be economically significant.
The water retention benefit isn't universal, though. In soils already high in organic matter or heavy clay soils, biochar additions may have minimal impact.
Biodiversity and yield impacts
Biochar can create habitat for beneficial soil microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi that drive nutrient cycling. The porous structure offers protection from predators and environmental stress, potentially increasing microbial diversity. Some studies show enhanced mycorrhizal associations—symbiotic relationships between fungi and plant roots that improve nutrient uptake.
Yield impacts are highly variable. Reviews of biochar field trials show average yield increases of 10-15%, but with wide variation: some trials show no effect, while others report gains of 50% or more. The largest yield benefits typically occur in acidic, nutrient-poor tropical soils.
Risks, limitations, and controversies
Biochar carbon removal comes with challenges that buyers and project developers need to address.
Feedstock sustainability
The most significant risk is unsustainable biomass sourcing. If feedstock comes from clearing forests or converting grasslands, the net climate benefit can be neutral or even negative. Indirect land-use change—where biochar feedstock displaces existing uses and triggers compensatory production elsewhere—can also undermine climate claims.
High-quality biochar projects prioritize true waste streams: residues from food processing, forestry operations, or municipal organic waste. Traceability systems and third-party audits help verify that biomass sourcing doesn't create unintended harm.
Air quality concerns
Poorly controlled pyrolysis can emit particulate matter and volatile organic compounds, creating local air quality risks. Traditional production using simple kilns can be particularly problematic. Modern biochar facilities address this through engineered reactors with temperature controls and emissions systems that minimize pollutant release.
Variability in carbon content
Not all biochar is created equal. The fixed carbon content—the fraction that's truly stable—varies with feedstock type, pyrolysis temperature, and reactor design. Low-temperature pyrolysis can produce material that's more like partially charred biomass than true biochar, with lower permanence.
Certification schemes like the European Biochar Certificate and International Biochar Initiative standards set thresholds for carbon content, stability measures, and contaminant levels.
Market outlook and biochar carbon removal credit price 2025
The biochar carbon credit market has grown as corporations seek durable removal solutions with measurable co-benefits.
Current credit pricing bands
Biochar credit prices typically range from $150 to $400+ per ton of CO₂ removed, with several factors driving this variation:
- Feedstock quality: Credits from projects using verified waste residues often command premiums over those using feedstocks with potential land-use concerns.
- Process quality: Higher-temperature pyrolysis with documented emissions controls prices higher than projects with limited transparency.
- Verification rigor: Credits issued under stringent protocols with third-party verification typically price above unregistered claims.
- Co-benefits: Projects delivering documented soil health improvements or supporting smallholder farmers may attract premiums.
Cost drivers and economies of scale
The cost of biochar carbon removal reflects feedstock procurement, preprocessing, reactor expenses, emissions controls, transport, and field application. Small-scale operations face higher unit costs due to limited utilization, while industrial-scale facilities benefit from automation and heat recovery.
Feedstock costs are a major variable—waste streams may be free or even carry tipping fees, while purpose-grown biomass incurs cultivation costs. Transport distances between feedstock sources, pyrolysis facilities, and application sites also significantly impact project economics.
Standards, MRV, and quality checks for biochar credits
High-quality biochar credits require robust measurement, reporting, and verification systems that track carbon flows from feedstock through end-use.
Leading registries and protocols
Several registries offer biochar methodologies with detailed requirements. Verra's Verified Carbon Standard includes biochar-specific protocols requiring feedstock traceability, conservative stability factors, and documentation of end-use application. Puro.earth's methodology emphasizes product quality thresholds, lifecycle assessment, and periodic third-party audits.
Key MRV data points
Effective verification systems capture data at each stage. Feedstock documentation includes origin, legality, and sustainability certification. Process monitoring tracks reactor temperature, residence time, and mass balances. Product characterization measures fixed carbon content, hydrogen-to-carbon ratio, and stability proxies.
Transport and application records document biochar movement from facility to field. Lifecycle accounting tallies emissions from collection, transport, and processing, subtracting these from gross carbon removal to arrive at net sequestration.
Comparing biochar to other biomass carbon removal and storage options
Biochar sits within a broader landscape of biomass-based removal pathways, each with different permanence profiles and costs.
MethodPermanenceCost RangePrimary Co-BenefitsBiocharHigh (centuries+)$150-400/tonSoil health, water retentionBio-oil injectionVery high (geological)$250-500/tonEnergy co-productsBECCSVery high (geological)$300-600/tonRenewable energyEnhanced rock weatheringVery high (mineral)$100-300/tonpH correction
How to buy high-quality biochar credits with confidence
Navigating the biochar credit market requires a clear strategy and rigorous quality assessment.
Step 1: Define removal goals
Start by establishing your carbon removal objectives: target volumes, permanence requirements, and budget. Determine whether biochar fits your voluntary offsetting strategy or compliance obligations. Consider whether co-benefits like soil health align with your organization's values.
Step 2: Evaluate project quality flags
Assess projects against key quality indicators:
- Feedstock traceability: Documented origin and sustainability certification, with preference for verified waste residues.
- Process controls: Reactor temperature logs and emissions control systems with third-party validation.
- Product stability: Hydrogen-to-carbon ratios and fixed carbon content meeting recognized standards.
- Net accounting: Full lifecycle assessments including transport and energy use.
- Application evidence: End-use records confirming biochar reached its intended destination.
Step 3: Monitor portfolio performance
Carbon credit procurement doesn't end at purchase. Track credit vintage performance, watch for project updates, and review periodic verification reports. Senken's platform aggregates verification data across your biochar holdings and generates compliance-ready reports aligned with CSRD, CDP, and SBTi frameworks.
Moving from insight to action for your climate strategy
Understanding biochar carbon removal is the first step—translating that knowledge into procurement decisions requires expert guidance. Senken's AI-powered Quality Framework evaluates biochar projects against 600+ metrics, helping you identify high-quality credits that align with your climate goals.
Ready to explore biochar credits for your climate strategy? Talk to a Senken expert to discuss your carbon removal goals.
FAQs about biochar carbon removal
How much CO₂ can one ton of biochar store?
High-quality woody biochar produced at temperatures above 500°C typically contains 70-85% fixed carbon by dry weight, translating to roughly 2.5 to 3 tons of CO₂ equivalent per ton of biochar. However, carbon credit methodologies apply conservative stability factors to account for slow oxidation, resulting in credited removals of approximately 2 to 2.5 tons CO₂ per ton of applied biochar.
Why is biochar sometimes considered controversial?
Concerns center on feedstock sustainability, air quality, and product variability. Critics worry that unsustainable biomass sourcing could drive deforestation or compete with food production. Poorly controlled pyrolysis operations can emit particulates. Additionally, inconsistent product quality raises questions about actual permanence. High-quality projects address these concerns through traceable waste-residue feedstocks, engineered reactors with emissions controls, and transparent verification.
Can biochar credits count toward science-based targets?
Science-based targets prioritize emissions reductions, with carbon removal playing a limited role primarily for residual emissions that cannot be eliminated through abatement. Under current Science Based Targets initiative guidance, high-quality removals like verified biochar can support net-zero claims for hard-to-abate emissions, but they don't substitute for near-term reduction targets.
What verification data should a buyer request from a biochar project?
Request comprehensive documentation covering the full production chain: feedstock origin and sustainability credentials, reactor operation logs with temperature and throughput data, product characterization reports showing fixed carbon and hydrogen-to-carbon ratio, transport records tracking biochar movement, application documentation including GPS coordinates, lifecycle calculations with transparent assumptions, and third-party verification statements confirming registry methodology compliance.