Now that we have covered how to establish your company's emissions, it's time to set the year-on-year emissions reduction targets to reduce your company's footprint at the right rate and yearly amount so that it aligns with the globally accepted Net Zero pathway. Once this has been completed, it is time to create your company’s Net Zero Pathway and plot it against the global or country-specific Net Zero Pathway.
Disclaimer: The process of creating a net zero pathway is technical and should be completed by in-house team members or external parties with the requisite capability. This is solely intended as an overview of the process.
Net zero targets are the key milestones on your net zero pathway. The two Net Zero targets which are critical for a company to set are the short-term and long-term net-zero targets.
Short-term targets- The point in time when you will half your emissions.
Long-term targets- The point in time when you will achieve net zero.
The below is applicable for the short and long-term targets plotted along the net zero pathway, as well as for the net zero targets.
Effective target setting involves balancing ambition with feasibility. Companies should aim for targets that challenge and push them towards significant improvements while remaining achievable and grounded in reality.
Targets should encompass all significant sources of emissions within the company's operations, as well as the net zero pathway and its milestones.
This means that a company should focus heavily on internal emissions reductions before even considering setting a net zero target, to set targets accurately.
A common strategy when creating lowered emissions targets is to also set an internal price on emissions, creating a monetary amount for the cost of their environmental impact. Seeing a financial equivalent of “cost-savings” with the emission calculations of targets can help generate buy-in from valuable stakeholders.
The Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) is a collaborative effort between CDP, the United Nations Global Compact, the World Resources Institute (WRI), and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). It is not a law but a framework and guideline that helps companies set ambitious carbon reduction targets in line with the latest climate science. The main goal is to enable companies to align their strategies with the objectives of the Paris Agreement.
The SBTi has established robust criteria for companies to follow:
The company's net zero pathway should at the very least aim to achieve the IPCC goal of net zero by 2050. It is best practice to then use frameworks, such as the SBTi, to set short and long-term targets. Only once longer-term milestones have been achieved, is it advised to set an actual net zero-year target. However, most companies go about setting ambitious net zero targets, once they have plotted their net zero pathway and started reducing their emissions. Setting a net zero target once the pathway has been implemented, adds confidence to the setting of the net zero.
To set SBTi targets, a company needs to:

Your company can set carbon reduction targets, including net-zero targets, without following Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) protocols, and in those cases, removal credits would not be required for your strategy, however, you may still seek out removal credits as part of a holistic decarbonisation strategy to meet your goals, SBTi or otherwise. — Carbonbetter
A company’s net zero pathway refers to the year-on-year measures that a specific company will take to align with the IPCC pathway, and the plotting of these measures on a graph, as illustrated below. A company’s pathway will always be tailored to the unique circumstances, operations, and capacities of the company.
A Company's Pathway is initially determined by your company's baseline emissions and your emissions reduction targets and transforms over time due to the influences of the potential ways to reduce emissions over time using MACC, and the use of carbon offsets to complement and increase the effectiveness of carbon reduction (decarbonisation) activities.
While a company’s pathway for emission reduction may be informed by the broader guidelines of the IPCC pathway, it is essentially a customised plan that fits the specific needs and goals of the company.
In the graph below you can see an example of this, where the orange line illustrates the company’s projected pathway of decreasing emissions over time, based on the implementation of reduction strategies and the anticipated timeline of their impact.
.png)
.png)
When we talk about the "IPCC pathway for companies," it refers to the guidance and scenarios provided by the IPCC for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The IPCC pathway sets out the year-on-year amount that global emissions need to be reduced to meet the net zero goal.
The net zero pathway is simply a tool that helps to set targets and track the progress of your reduction measures in line with the IPCC net zero pathway.
If your company’s reduction pathway is above IPCC 1.5° pathway (orange line), we recommend to compensate the difference between your real pathway and the IPCC one (green area).
Now, you can see the exact figures that define the IPCC 1.5° pathway. Since there are currently no regulations on reduction targets, we anticipate that the actual targets will be close to or even more stringent than these figures. Therefore, we strongly advise companies to begin taking action now in order to avoid facing severe reduction and compensation regulations in the future.

Similarly to the previously mentioned Mitigation Hierarchy, the three types of emissions influencing the net zero pathway are:
It is standard practice for net zero that avoidable emissions cannot be compensated for by using carbon credits. By avoiding this route, you are safeguarding your company against the reputational risk that is greenwashing.
It is standard practice in hard-to-abate emissions management, that these emissions can be compensated for by using carbon credits. The proper term for this is “compensation”, and is key to reaching Net Zero.
It is standard practice in unavoidable emissions management, that these emissions can be compensated for by using carbon credits. The proper term for this is “neutralisation”, and is key to reaching Net Zero.
The generally accepted rule of thumb is that only an estimated 5-10% of all a company's emissions will be unavoidable or hard to remove. This helps companies take accountability for their current emissions and begin to estimate the amount of emissions they might need to offset or neutralise with carbon credits.
Once the Net Zero pathway has been plotted against the IPCC pathway for Net Zero, then you need to:
It is definitely no easy task to calculate or even estimate unavoidable emissions. To counter this problem, companies use the latest data stating that for most sectors, residual emissions (hard-to-abate and unavoidable emissions) normally account for 5-10% of company emissions.
Both SBTI and IPCC recommend using only carbon removal credits to compensate and neutralise their emissions. While there is no particular regulation yet, we recommend using high-quality removal credits for your net zero journey.
Senken offers high-quality and risk-free carbon removal credits for your long-term net zero journey. Explore our platform to learn more.